Index
> Macroinstructions > sorry Tomasz, another one |
| Author |
|
|
Tomasz Grysztar 11 Nov 2010, 19:03
As I already suggested in the other thread: please treat the globals context after the "struct" definition as undefined (I mean: unknown). This is something that may change from implementation to implementation and to rely on any specific behavior would not be a good idea.
|
|||
11 Nov 2010, 19:03 |
|
|
ouadji 11 Nov 2010, 19:53
Thank you for the tip ... but this reasoning is valid for a compiler, not for something which is "seen". Here, I highlight or I do not highlight the words ... Wink must behave faithful to the result of compilation! Wink can not highlight a word, and then have a failure compilation. So I must also manage this situation .... and adjust if needed later. I must be faithful to the result of compilation, and for that, Wink must handle even the imperfections or uncertainties. (Even if this is the result of a absurd code .) _________________ I am not young enough to know everything (Oscar Wilde)-  |
|||
|
11 Nov 2010, 19:53 |
|
|
Tomasz Grysztar 11 Nov 2010, 20:51
The only way to be sure what the assembler will see would be to expand the macros in real-time. If you don't do it, then you will always have some cases where labels ends up meaning something different than your highlighter thought. Then why do you insist on having this one case covered when inevitably you are going to have other similar problems with macros anyway?
|
|||
|
11 Nov 2010, 20:51 |
|
|
ouadji 11 Nov 2010, 21:58
Quote: to expand the macros in real-time. but in terms of computation time, it's almost impossible. Quote: Then why do you insist on having this one case covered when inevitably you are going to have other similar problems with macros anyway ? 
my English, my god! ... I try anyway ... 
I speak here only about the macro "struct" (for now). I will not be able to manage everything. For example, "struc" will be very difficult to manage, almost impossible. In this case, I turn off the engine and i leave only the highlighting of keywords. Why ? because the most importantly is to not give false information ... don't highlight a word is less serious than highlight a word that should not be (my english ... ). In the case of the macro "struct", i think I can get a perfect result. The results are already very good. one thing at a time ...
local labels, global labels,anonymous labels, keywords, multiline comments,management of the back-slash, of long lines, proc/endp, "label x", "x dd ?", now ... struct/{struct/union}/ends, and after, label/labels/endl for proc macro ... one thing at a time, slowly ! Of course because of macro language it will be impossible to manage everything in real time, however it is possible to manage many things. _________________ I am not young enough to know everything (Oscar Wilde)- |
|||
|
11 Nov 2010, 21:58 |
|
|
ouadji 11 Nov 2010, 22:25
just a few instructions, The core of next Wink has nothing to do with Wink 6.57 ! Each task can modify the "task_bitmap" itself ... it's very powerful! Code:
....
push edi ebp
push [task_bitmap] <-- ------- ; very powerfull
mov ebp,[task_bitmap]
bts ebp,31
.task_manager: bsf edi,ebp ;<-- and back
btr ebp,edi
jmp [task_list + (edi*4)] ;--> go
.END_oEv: pop [task_bitmap]
pop ebp edi
jmp .ebp_Pos
....
task_list dd \
\
Full_Scan.engine_capture_BEFORE ,\ ;0 ;00
Full_Scan.engine_global_words_selector ,\ ;1 ;01
Full_Scan.engine_proc_and_label_name ,\ ;0 ;02
Full_Scan.engine_label_and_label_name ,\ ;0 ;03
\
Full_Scan.engine_start_struct_and_name ,\ ;0 ;04
Full_Scan.engine_data_label ,\ ;0 ;05
Full_Scan.engine_ends_struct ,\ ;0 ;06
Full_Scan.engine_endp_proc ,\ ;0 ;07
\
Full_Scan.engine_endl ,\ ;0 ;08
Full_Scan.engine_locals ,\ ;0 ;09
Full_Scan.engine_local ,\ ;0 ;10
Full_Scan.engine_macro ,\ ;0 ;11
\
Full_Scan.engine_struc ,\ ;0 ;12
Full_Scan.engine_code_label ,\ ;0 ;13
Full_Scan.engine_union_inside_a_struct ,\ ;0 ;14
Full_Scan.engine_struct_inside_a_struct ,\ ;0 ;15
\
Full_Scan.engine_capture_AFTER ,\ ;1 ;16
Full_Scan.engine_1st_2nd_words ,\ ;0 ;17
...
Full_Scan.END_oEv ,\ ;31
...
_________________ I am not young enough to know everything (Oscar Wilde)- |
|||
|
11 Nov 2010, 22:25 |
|
< Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|