Index
> Main > TAJGA Fasm Tutorial (vid)Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next |
| Author |
|
. Now it should be fixed.
|
MazeGen 29 Dec 2004, 21:26
vid wrote:
All flags remain unchanged - Intel manual. vid wrote: 3. What does it do when shifitng by more than is number of bits of destination (i know this was used for processor detection, so it differs) The shift count is masked by 0x1F since 80286. For processors prior to 80286, the result is probably zero (I expect it is the same result as for SHL AL,9) |
|||
29 Dec 2004, 21:26 |
|
|
decard 30 Dec 2004, 11:59
online version of tutorial updated
 |
|||
|
30 Dec 2004, 11:59 |
|
|
Nikolay Petrov 01 Mar 2005, 07:49
Hi vid,
your tutorial is good, and i found a time to compile as help(chm) file format. If you dont like something - tell me
|
|||||||||||
|
01 Mar 2005, 07:49 |
|
|
vid 01 Mar 2005, 12:25
really nice, how much work is it to make chm from HTMLs? Can it be somehow scripted or so so i can make one for every release?
|
|||
|
01 Mar 2005, 12:25 |
|
|
iklin 01 Mar 2005, 15:52
vid wrote: how much work is it to make chm from HTMLs? Simplest way - Htm2Chm or Chm4You. But there are more flexible ways.  |
|||
|
01 Mar 2005, 15:52 |
|
|
herbal 01 Mar 2005, 18:16
What had happened to decard's website? It seems it's down now. For how long? It's a shame, because Tajga tutorial is really cool for beginners - it explains basics of assemby and, by the way, how does pc's processor and memory work! Lots of newbies are waiting for continuatnion! Don't take them down! (sorry for my english, I will improve it, I promise)
|
|||
|
01 Mar 2005, 18:16 |
|
|
Nikolay Petrov 01 Mar 2005, 19:26
vid wrote: really nice, how much work is it to make chm from HTMLs?...   |
|||
|
01 Mar 2005, 19:26 |
|
|
vid 02 Mar 2005, 09:00
herbal: decard's site works well for me. And even if it doesn't you can still download tutorial from first post of this thread.
iklin: could you make some batch/script to convert HTML version to CHM? I personally like CHM more. |
|||
|
02 Mar 2005, 09:00 |
|
|
iklin 02 Mar 2005, 15:56
vid wrote: iklin: could you make some batch/script to convert HTML version to CHM? I personally like CHM more.  Sorry, but... no I couldn't.
I'm use nothing but Htm2Chm - http://yarix.by.ru/ or Chm4You! - http://supex.by.ru/chm4you121.zip Make your tutorial as a simple site and than convert it with one of this utilities. I recommend Htm2Chm - it can compile, decompile and so on and on his site there are some useful proggies like SaveChm which I use everyday. |
|||
|
02 Mar 2005, 15:56 |
|
|
vid 02 Mar 2005, 21:26
someone has experiences with this? I'd like some sort of script for this so i can compile every new version...
|
|||
|
02 Mar 2005, 21:26 |
|
|
MazeGen 02 Mar 2005, 21:28
What about XML? Well, you have to learn something about it, but it is generally very useful.
|
|||
|
02 Mar 2005, 21:28 |
|
|
vid 04 Mar 2005, 10:06
right now i am doing my best not to learn anything
|
|||
|
04 Mar 2005, 10:06 |
|
|
UCM 27 Mar 2005, 21:03
vid wrote: right now i am doing my best not to learn anything Lol
Anyway, I'm rather surprised nobody has noticed this yet... CR = move cursor to beginning of line LF = go to next line not the other way around By the way, ASCII 0-31 aren't special for int 21h/ah=9, they always do that (see LookupTables.) And also, in CMD.EXE, LF is enough to go to beginning of next line, but Notepad (and other text editors) don't like it, it's represented as an invisible character. (same with CR) P.S. I know alot of this from using PHP |
|||
|
27 Mar 2005, 21:03 |
|
|
rob.rice 31 Mar 2005, 00:56
vid wrote: thx, fixed it. This is kind of post i really lack, i found many I have a user account named wizard so I can use the -D command line option that makes it hard to pull myself away from the computer to EAT  |
|||
|
31 Mar 2005, 00:56 |
|
|
vid 04 Apr 2005, 13:20
UCM: thanks for report, i'll look at that.
well, "ASCII 0-31" are always special, but what i meant is that not all write routines apply all ASCII meanings to those characters, sometimes they draw their ascii "picture" instead of performing action of that char. |
|||
|
04 Apr 2005, 13:20 |
|
|
Giedrius 04 Apr 2005, 19:05
Quote: terms: incrementing (adding 1), decrementing (substracting 0) _________________ Better to rule in hell, than to be a slave in heaven... |
|||
|
04 Apr 2005, 19:05 |
|
|
vid 08 Apr 2005, 10:46
yeah, thanks. This is my fix, i always use word "substract", don't know why. Unfortunately right now my computer is kind-of destroyed (friend tossed bear on it, it's a notebook) so i can't be very active about the tutorial right now. I don't even know if my data isn't destroyed.
|
|||
|
08 Apr 2005, 10:46 |
|
|
UCM 10 Apr 2005, 03:41
vid: Well, no, because they always do that in MS-DOS (the old meanings are almost all obsolete and unused and unimplemented).
|
|||
|
10 Apr 2005, 03:41 |
|
|
vid 11 Apr 2005, 13:07
OK, i could rewrite it to "... are special for MS-DOS services" but problwem here is that only DOS services readers know are 2 and 9, and they probably don't even have a clue what "DOS service" is. I will think of something when i get my computer repaired.
|
|||
|
11 Apr 2005, 13:07 |
|
| Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next < Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|