flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.
Index
> Linux > Source Control? |
Author |
|
pelaillo 04 Jun 2010, 20:00
GIT is superior than SVN in many ways. Try it, it's smaller, faster, simpler.
|
|||
04 Jun 2010, 20:00 |
|
mindcooler 04 Jun 2010, 22:15
Git for Linux, SVN for Windows.
|
|||
04 Jun 2010, 22:15 |
|
revolution 05 Jun 2010, 02:18
Tyler: I hope you are not expecting GIT or SVN to be a substitute for a proper backup procedure.
Drives do break, as you have experienced, and only a good set of backups will allow you to recover. |
|||
05 Jun 2010, 02:18 |
|
Tyler 05 Jun 2010, 02:56
Thanks for all your input but, I'm pretty sure now that it's not really a revision control system I need(not for backup anyway), would I be an evil person to incorporate the backup(just save the dir from my flash drive to my HDD) into my makefile?
I'm still going to use Git, mainly for the revision tracking, not really for backup-ing though. revolution wrote:
I was, but now I see it's not that simple. As long as my HDD and my flash drive don't break at the same time, I'll be okay. |
|||
05 Jun 2010, 02:56 |
|
f0dder 06 Jun 2010, 21:41
GIT for Windows as well as linux, really - and definitely not a replacement for backups.
|
|||
06 Jun 2010, 21:41 |
|
Tyler 06 Jun 2010, 22:00
I had a misconception of how source control works. I was thinking of it more as a server/client like thing as opposed to reality, different local copies.
Is there anything you would recommend for backups? |
|||
06 Jun 2010, 22:00 |
|
f0dder 06 Jun 2010, 22:42
Tyler wrote: I had a misconception of how source control works. I was thinking of it more as a server/client like thing as opposed to reality, different local copies. I used subversion for several years before transitioning to git, and I still think svn is a decent piece of software... but it has a lot of problems (especially when you work with other people who aren't well disciplined wrt. source control), and it's network protocol is extremely inefficient. As for backup, I haven't found something I really like yet. SpiderOak is OK for online backups, but has it's own problems, and for big files you'll want something local. Pretty much all backup programs I've seen kinda suck _________________ - carpe noctem |
|||
06 Jun 2010, 22:42 |
|
Tyler 06 Jun 2010, 23:04
This is kinda unrelated, but related in purpose. Is it possible to enable a form of autorun on Linux? I could set up a script on my flash drive that would store a copy to the HDD every time I plug in my flash drive. Kinda ad-hock but it's simple and would work for what I need it to.
|
|||
06 Jun 2010, 23:04 |
|
SFeLi 07 Jun 2010, 08:50
Btw, have anyone tried fossil?
|
|||
07 Jun 2010, 08:50 |
|
< Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|
Copyright © 1999-2024, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube.
Website powered by rwasa.