Index
> Compiler Internals > Will future v. of Fasm include Itanium instructions set ?Goto page Previous 1, 2 |
| Author |
|
|
hopcode 19 Jan 2010, 16:05
revolution wrote: ...write an Itanium version of fasm, fasmitanium and revolution wrote: I would be interested to see how you handle the instruction bundling. At the moment, i think of soemthing new in a general way. I cannot enter new fields without being sure that they are the right fields for me. For example, i dont know nothing of ARM, very few of Motorola. Only a thing about names, not so important but please, observe how many things on sourceforge related to fasm http://sourceforge.net/search/?type_of_search=soft&words=fasm unrealized, without concreteness That is... the fasm name in its overbloating compounded words. Fasm is very actractive... OK, If one day i say i do a fasmitanium-something, it means that i will build it, i realize it. In the meanwhile i hope Tomasz will implement SSE5 in fasm 1.70, because i have it done in my flde engine, and i dont know how to test it without coding them macro-manually 
Regards, hopcode |
|||
19 Jan 2010, 16:05 |
|
|
revolution 05 Apr 2010, 06:42
When MS say you are dead, then you are dead.
Microsoft Ending Support for Itanium Sorry Intel, you lose. I don't think HP can save you. |
|||
|
05 Apr 2010, 06:42 |
|
| Goto page Previous 1, 2 < Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|