Windows PROC at 7FFE0300h

Index > Windows > Windows PROC at 7FFE0300h

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3

Author

Thread

Borsuc

Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 2465
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Borsuc 07 Nov 2009, 01:59

lol man you can't be serious. FASM is not a HLL. I said C is the lowest HLL language I know.

07 Nov 2009, 01:59

Azu

Joined: 16 Dec 2008
Posts: 1159

Azu 07 Nov 2009, 02:01

Lowest high level language? That's an oxymoron.

C is high level.

Would you like it if I called FASM the "highest low level language"? Laughing

_________________

07 Nov 2009, 02:01

comrade

Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 1150
Location: Russian Federation

comrade 07 Nov 2009, 02:13

C--, D, or C. All 3 are used for OS coding. I guess that's sort of an answer to sort of a question.

07 Nov 2009, 02:13

Borsuc

Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 2465
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Borsuc 07 Nov 2009, 02:14

No it's not an oxymoron, I didn't say "low high level language", but the lowest, which is in comparison with other HLLs.

And FASM is indeed one of the highest low-level languages, with its powerful macro capabilities. Smile

07 Nov 2009, 02:14

Azu

Joined: 16 Dec 2008
Posts: 1159

Azu 07 Nov 2009, 02:16

Borsuc wrote:

low high level language

That's an oxymoron too.

Borsuc wrote:

but the lowest

The lowest what???? Confused

Borsuc wrote:

And FASM is indeed one of the highest low-level languages, with its powerful macro capabilities.

Even if it's the highest low-level language and C is the lowest high-level language, FASM is still lower level than C. Over 4 times lower.

comrade wrote:

C--, D, or C. All 3 are used for OS coding. I guess that's sort of an answer to sort of a question.

Sort of...

_________________

Last edited by Azu on 07 Nov 2009, 02:18; edited 1 time in total

07 Nov 2009, 02:16

Borsuc

Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 2465
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Borsuc 07 Nov 2009, 02:18

Azu wrote:

Even if it's the highest low-level language and C is the lowest high-level language, FASM is still lower level than C.

...yeah

I don't think I said otherwise. Obviously FASM is a LLL, C is a HLL. The fact that it's the lowest among HLLs that I know (except C--) doesn't make it a LLL, it's still a HLL.

Code:

|-- -------x--| |y-----------|

FASM is x, C is y (ok that's just arbitrary but you get what I mean).

_________________
Previously known as The_Grey_Beast

07 Nov 2009, 02:18

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 20445
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution 07 Nov 2009, 02:18

Borsuc: Some people here are absolutists, if it isn't absolutely 100% perfect then it is absolutely 100% "shitty". So trying to use comparative terms in the proper way (like you did) doesn't get you anywhere. Wink

07 Nov 2009, 02:18

Azu

Joined: 16 Dec 2008
Posts: 1159

Azu 07 Nov 2009, 02:20

Borsuc wrote:

I said otherwise.

Exactly!

Borsuc wrote:

Obviously

Ya.

Borsuc wrote:

FASM is a LLL, C is a HLL. The fact that it's the lowest among HLLs that I know (except C--) doesn't make it a LLL, it's still a HLL.

Exactly! It is a very high language. FASM is much lower. Maybe even 5 times lower

Borsuc wrote:

|---------x--| |y-----------|

AWESOME!

revolution wrote:

Borsuc: Some people here are absolutists, if it isn't absolutely 100% perfect then it is absolutely 100% "shitty". So trying to use comparative terms in the proper way (like you did) doesn't get you anywhere.

And some people think Windows is 90% shit and 10% ripped BSD code..

_________________

07 Nov 2009, 02:20

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3

< Last Thread | Next Thread >

Forum Rules:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum