flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.
![]() |
Author |
|
revolution
rb = reserve bytes.
Code: rb 100 ;place 100 bytes into the code Code: db 100 dup (?) |
|||
![]() |
|
iic2
I keep up better by using dd and db. It a matter of appeal i guest.
|
|||
![]() |
|
GhostXoPCorp
it just puts 100 spaces in the code?
_________________ Oh that divide overflow. Just jumps out of the bushes every time to scare the day lights out of me. |
|||
![]() |
|
revolution
GhostXoPCorp wrote: it just puts 100 spaces in the code? |
|||
![]() |
|
bitRAKE
Code: MyData rb 100 |
|||
![]() |
|
GhostXoPCorp
is this a better option in making buffers?
_________________ Oh that divide overflow. Just jumps out of the bushes every time to scare the day lights out of me. |
|||
![]() |
|
revolution
Better option than what?
|
|||
![]() |
|
GhostXoPCorp
is rb a better option for making buffers for getting keys and other stuff that needs stored in buffers
_________________ Oh that divide overflow. Just jumps out of the bushes every time to scare the day lights out of me. |
|||
![]() |
|
iic2
You're talking about gathering -up your security files or needing organization, etc? I really don't think it makes no difference, they both work!... but I would never overlook any previous response which carries it own weight in gold.
I like db and dd because as well as FASM, other ASM communities also carry thousands of top-of-the-line examples that will teach you *minumun* the advanced stuff so fast it's embarrassing. This is masm32. I don't like preliminaries, I like light/warp speed, so I go one-below where the (real) action is ![]() I like keeping things as simple as possible when it's time to translate, with-out the need of involving other lang to get a simple job done. |
|||
![]() |
|
Borsuc
GhostXoPCorp wrote: it just puts 100 spaces in the code? _________________ Previously known as The_Grey_Beast |
|||
![]() |
|
revolution
Borsuc wrote: On the other hand db will surely put that data in your executable. Code: db ? |
|||
![]() |
|
Borsuc
revolution wrote: That is wrong. See the second post above. db can also put uninitialised data ![]() _________________ Previously known as The_Grey_Beast |
|||
![]() |
|
< Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|
Copyright © 1999-2020, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube, Twitter.
Website powered by rwasa.