flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.
![]() |
Author |
|
roxaz
|
|||
![]() |
|
revolution
fasm already supports mixed 32/64 code. Has done for a long time.
|
|||
![]() |
|
Tomasz Grysztar
And with fasm you really don't have to use "db" directives to build jumps.
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
Tomasz Grysztar
bitRAKE: still one thing could use small correction - put USE32 after RETF instead of before (because return instruction still belongs to a 64-bit world) and change RETF to RETFD to get same result in a more "proper" way.
|
|||
![]() |
|
roxaz
heh noob me... should have checked before posting ^_^
|
|||
![]() |
|
LocoDelAssembly
I hope the people who asked about mixing 32- and 64-bit code is looking at this right now. Any comments about the reliability of this method?
|
|||
![]() |
|
Borsuc
What's with the 33h after the call? Is that a segment? How does it work anyway?
![]() (btw is hard-coding segment values reliable?) _________________ Previously known as The_Grey_Beast |
|||
![]() |
|
windwakr
website at top of thread wrote:
|
|||
![]() |
|
revolution
LocoDelAssembly wrote: Any comments about the reliability of this method? |
|||
![]() |
|
Borsuc
Exactly that was the point of my question.
_________________ Previously known as The_Grey_Beast |
|||
![]() |
|
Madis731
|
|||
![]() |
|
< Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|
Copyright © 1999-2020, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube, Twitter.
Website powered by rwasa.