Index
> Macroinstructions > invalid macro arguments. problem. |
| Author |
|
|
Tomasz Grysztar 06 Dec 2006, 14:43
First argument is (test_a and the second is <"1"> - preprocessor notices there's something other than comma after the ">" (which ends argument - preprocessors count the occurences of "<" and ">" to determine which one end an argument) and throws an error.
|
|||
06 Dec 2006, 14:43 |
|
|
vid 06 Dec 2006, 17:27
tomasz: how to include "<" into macro arguments?
 |
|||
|
06 Dec 2006, 17:27 |
|
|
dead_body 06 Dec 2006, 18:34
Code: macro test [arg] { common match some<some?,arg \{ display "< included"\} } test (0,<"1">,0) |
|||
|
06 Dec 2006, 18:34 |
|
|
dead_body 06 Dec 2006, 18:50
;why here is error?
;macro test must receive one argument. Code: macro test [arg] { common arg ;here i want to see: (0,<"1">) } test (0,<"1">) ;How can I tell to fasm, that I want to receive one argument, ;or how can I receive that argument? |
|||
|
06 Dec 2006, 18:50 |
|
|
Tomasz Grysztar 08 Dec 2006, 09:33
"<" at a beginning of parameter has a special meaning to preprocessor, there's no way to come round it.
|
|||
|
08 Dec 2006, 09:33 |
|
|
dead_body 08 Dec 2006, 10:42
maybe it is time to do a substring fix?
Code: >) substring_fix >,) macro test [arg] ;and here will be normal |
|||
|
08 Dec 2006, 10:42 |
|
|
vid 10 Dec 2006, 00:28
dead body: i still don't get what you want to do with these things
|
|||
|
10 Dec 2006, 00:28 |
|
|
dead_body 10 Dec 2006, 13:16
vid wrote: dead body: i still don't get what you want to do with these things i wrote macroses(for about a month ago) that do something like that: Code: change_syntax name_of_function:invoke,name_of_function2:libcall ;and now, you can write something like that: name_of_function(param1,name_of_function2("1"),other_args) ;and macroses change it to: invoke name_of_function,param1,<libcall name_of_function2,"1">,other_args like a small script
now i have some free time, and i want to finish them, but i have a problem listed in my first post. i think substring fix is a good idea, but Tomasz say nothing about this, maybe for him substring fix is not a good idea, and now i am searching for another ways. |
|||
|
10 Dec 2006, 13:16 |
|
|
dead_body 14 Dec 2006, 20:59
is there news?
|
|||
|
14 Dec 2006, 20:59 |
|
|
Tomasz Grysztar 14 Dec 2006, 22:16
Since < and > have this special meaning, you may use some other characters for this purpose (since you anyway need to parse this syntax with "match"), the round brackets seem to be quite good choice.
Oh, well you can also escape those characters like: Code: test_macro (test_a,\<"1"\>) but perhaps that's not what you need. |
|||
|
14 Dec 2006, 22:16 |
|
|
vid 20 Dec 2006, 23:28
topic continues here
|
|||
|
20 Dec 2006, 23:28 |
|
< Last Thread | Next Thread > |
Forum Rules:
|