which name do you like more? because i like "idata" more. it better describes what's inside and is also shorter and easier to write, and that is important in often used thing.
I am asking for purposes of fasm standard library (if it'll ever really start )

'idata' and 'udata' aren't bad. I could even change Fresh lib... what do you think about 'IncludeAllGlobals' name?

IncludeAllData? I think this one isn't that important, used once per file, and name is such that it shouldn't conflict. And it's "beaty" is least important...

Voted on 'idata'. I got used to iglobal, but I think the new name is nicer. IncludeAllGlobals or IncludeAllData? It doesn't matter really as it is used once, but if we change to idata/udata let's change also to IncludeAllData

okay, here is updates "globals.inc" for fasmlib. string constants are removed for now (we still don't know how the string will look like in fasmlib). I renamed it, cleared some (hopefully) useless stuff in macros, and indented + commented it so it's much better readable.

btw, shouldn't "endg" then change to "endd"? i personaly like "endg" more, but it wouldn't be very logical for new ones...

I prefer 'endg'. Let's not change it.
Btw. good work with globals macros!