flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.

Index > Main > "iglobal" or "idata"?


which one?
idata, udata
85%
 85%  [ 12 ]
iglobal, uglobal
14%
 14%  [ 2 ]
Total Votes : 14

Author
Thread Post new topic Reply to topic
vid
Verbosity in development


Joined: 05 Sep 2003
Posts: 7105
Location: Slovakia
vid 18 Oct 2005, 17:56
which name do you like more? because i like "idata" more. it better describes what's inside and is also shorter and easier to write, and that is important in often used thing.
I am asking for purposes of fasm standard library (if it'll ever really start Smile )
Post 18 Oct 2005, 17:56
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger ICQ Number Reply with quote
decard



Joined: 11 Sep 2003
Posts: 1092
Location: Poland
decard 18 Oct 2005, 18:52
'idata' and 'udata' aren't bad. I could even change Fresh lib... what do you think about 'IncludeAllGlobals' name?
Post 18 Oct 2005, 18:52
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
vid
Verbosity in development


Joined: 05 Sep 2003
Posts: 7105
Location: Slovakia
vid 18 Oct 2005, 19:42
IncludeAllData? I think this one isn't that important, used once per file, and name is such that it shouldn't conflict. And it's "beaty" is least important...
Post 18 Oct 2005, 19:42
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger ICQ Number Reply with quote
Reverend



Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 408
Location: Poland
Reverend 18 Oct 2005, 19:54
Voted on 'idata'. I got used to iglobal, but I think the new name is nicer. IncludeAllGlobals or IncludeAllData? It doesn't matter really as it is used once, but if we change to idata/udata let's change also to IncludeAllData
Post 18 Oct 2005, 19:54
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
vid
Verbosity in development


Joined: 05 Sep 2003
Posts: 7105
Location: Slovakia
vid 18 Oct 2005, 20:52
okay, here is updates "globals.inc" for fasmlib. string constants are removed for now (we still don't know how the string will look like in fasmlib). I renamed it, cleared some (hopefully) useless stuff in macros, and indented + commented it so it's much better readable.


Description:
Download
Filename: new_globals.zip
Filesize: 868 Bytes
Downloaded: 471 Time(s)

Post 18 Oct 2005, 20:52
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger ICQ Number Reply with quote
vid
Verbosity in development


Joined: 05 Sep 2003
Posts: 7105
Location: Slovakia
vid 18 Oct 2005, 22:19
btw, shouldn't "endg" then change to "endd"? i personaly like "endg" more, but it wouldn't be very logical for new ones...
Post 18 Oct 2005, 22:19
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger ICQ Number Reply with quote
Reverend



Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 408
Location: Poland
Reverend 19 Oct 2005, 18:02
I prefer 'endg'. Let's not change it.
Btw. good work with globals macros!
Post 19 Oct 2005, 18:02
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:
Post new topic Reply to topic

Jump to:  


< Last Thread | Next Thread >
Forum Rules:
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Copyright © 1999-2024, Tomasz Grysztar. Also on GitHub, YouTube.

Website powered by rwasa.