Index > Windows > Macro Help!

Author

Thread

windwakr Joined: 30 Jun 2004 Posts: 827 Location: Michigan, USA	windwakr In dev-c++ theres a function RGB(0,0,0). And it goes like Code: RGB(r,g,b) { return r+(g<<8)+(b<<16); } I thought hmm thats gotta be easy to convert to asm.....I was wrong. I keep getting error after error. Can anyone help? _________________ ----> * <---- My star, won HERE
14 Aug 2004, 19:04

Tomasz Grysztar Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 8016 Location: Kraków, Poland	Tomasz Grysztar Code: macro RGB target,r,g,b { mov target,r+g shl 8+b shl 16 } RGB eax,0,0,0
14 Aug 2004, 19:11

windwakr Joined: 30 Jun 2004 Posts: 827 Location: Michigan, USA	windwakr havent tested yet but thanks!
14 Aug 2004, 19:13

HarryTuttle Joined: 26 Sep 2003 Posts: 211 Location: Poland	HarryTuttle there is nothing to testing, it is raw and right thx Privalov! every time when I see your solutions I start to believe in simplicity in fasm programming. _________________ Microsoft: brings power of yesterday to computers of today.
16 Aug 2004, 08:54

IceStudent Joined: 19 Dec 2003 Posts: 60 Location: Ukraine	IceStudent Why not implemented return operator? I mean operator like EXITM at the MASM. I think, it's very useful macro...
17 Aug 2004, 17:24

mike.dld Joined: 03 Oct 2003 Posts: 235 Location: Belarus, Minsk	mike.dld Agree with you, IceStudent. Maybe it won't require to rewrite many parts of compiler to allow use of macroses in instructions e.g. mov eax,RGB(0,0,0)? _________________ http://ostin.googlecode.com/
17 Aug 2004, 19:08

Tomasz Grysztar Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 8016 Location: Kraków, Poland	Tomasz Grysztar It wouldn't require rewriting any parts of compiler, it would require to write a new one. (I might suggest some HLL->FASM compiler aswell...)
17 Aug 2004, 19:23

Madis731 Joined: 25 Sep 2003 Posts: 2139 Location: Estonia	Madis731 Was that small or what I did 150% scale on my font so I could finally see the writing, but also Ctrl+C -> Ctrl+V to the addressbar or Notepad helped
18 Aug 2004, 09:58

Joshua Joined: 12 Jul 2003 Posts: 56 Location: Belgium	Joshua that's what they call the fine print
18 Aug 2004, 21:41

vid Verbosity in development Joined: 05 Sep 2003 Posts: 7105 Location: Slovakia	vid Quote: It wouldn't require rewriting any parts of compiler, it would require to write a new one Would it be such hard to make equates take arguments. It would solve such problems and make preprocesor more powerful. I don't see a big problem here...
20 Aug 2004, 19:59

Tomasz Grysztar Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 8016 Location: Kraków, Poland	Tomasz Grysztar The problem I see is the time needed to implement it. And it's anyway a bit out of the fasm's syntax image. For such purposes I would really recommend some alternative preprocessor, like HLA.
20 Aug 2004, 20:17

S.T.A.S. Joined: 09 Jan 2004 Posts: 173 Location: Ru#27	S.T.A.S. Hmm.. actually return can be implemented with the help of macros. I posted some set of macro which is based on such things: http://board.flatassembler.net/topic.php?t=1889
22 Aug 2004, 10:39

Display posts from previous: All Posts1 Day7 Days2 Weeks1 Month3 Months6 Months1 Year Oldest FirstNewest First

Jump to: Select a forum Official----------------AssemblyPeripheria General----------------MainTutorials and ExamplesDOSWindowsLinuxUnixMenuetOS Specific----------------MacroinstructionsOS ConstructionIDE DevelopmentProjects and IdeasNon-x86 architecturesHigh Level LanguagesProgramming Language DesignCompiler Internals Other----------------FeedbackHeapTest Area

< Last Thread | Next Thread >

Forum Rules: You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum