Silly or BUG: INC [EBX] vs INC [EBP] ???

flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.

Index > Main > Silly or BUG: INC [EBX] vs INC [EBP] ???

Author

Thread

DOS386

Joined: 08 Dec 2006
Posts: 1898

DOS386

Code:

INC DWORD [EBX]

2 Byte's

Code:

INC DWORD [EBP]

3 Byte's

No way to encode [EBP] with just 2 Byte's ???

12 Jun 2010, 23:20

LocoDelAssembly
Your code has a bug

Joined: 06 May 2005
Posts: 4624
Location: Argentina

LocoDelAssembly

DOS386 wrote:

Code:
INC DWORD [EBX]
    
2 Byte's
Code:
INC DWORD [EBP]
    
3 Byte's

No way to encode [EBP] with just 2 Byte's ???

Refer to "Table 2-2. 32-Bit Addressing Forms with the ModR/M Byte" in Intel's manual vol2A. As you'll see, "INC DWORD [EBP+$00]" is the shortest.

12 Jun 2010, 23:56

score_under

Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 27

score_under

MOV EAX,[ESP+4] = 4 bytes.
MOV EAX,[EBP+4] = 3 bytes.

It's just one of those cases where there actually *is* a difference between registers on x86 Wink

14 Jun 2010, 19:55

bitshifter

Joined: 04 Dec 2007
Posts: 786
Location: Massachusetts, USA

bitshifter

Also note: DOS386's code assumes use32

14 Jun 2010, 23:50

score_under

Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 27

score_under

bitshifter wrote:

Also note: DOS386's code assumes use32

Uhh... real men use64 or something? Razz

20 Jun 2010, 19:37

baldr

Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Posts: 1651

baldr

score_under,

16/64-bit inc [ebx] requires address-size prefix and can't be 2 bytes long. 32-bit can.

20 Jun 2010, 20:57

DOS386

Joined: 08 Dec 2006
Posts: 1898

DOS386

Thanks.

> assumes use32

Right.

27 Jun 2010, 11:00

< Last Thread | Next Thread >

Forum Rules:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum