What is the best pie you can get with 9 digits?

Index > Heap > What is the best pie you can get with 9 digits?

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 27, 28, 29 Next

Author

Thread

asmhack

Joined: 01 Feb 2008
Posts: 431

asmhack

revolution wrote:

Yes, okay cr/lf are invisible but they are still needed for the construct to work, and also they are not in the set {0x20..0x7e} so I have to disqualify on technical grounds.

but if you write that on paper you will still have 9 chars Wink

so automatically the limits are disabled because cr/lf is not supported ?
but you said limits are ok..

06 Mar 2008, 14:43

asmhack

Joined: 01 Feb 2008
Posts: 431

asmhack

Code:

$FFFFFFFF

06 Mar 2008, 14:50

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 16850
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution

asmhack wrote:

revolution wrote:
Yes, okay cr/lf are invisible but they are still needed for the construct to work, and also they are not in the set {0x20..0x7e} so I have to disqualify on technical grounds.

but if you write that on paper you will still have 9 chars
so automatically the limits are disabled because cr/lf is not supported ?
but you said limits are ok..

Alright, in that case I allow cr/lf not to be counted, but I doubt it will help you. And, yes, limits are supported if you can write it all within 9 ASCII characters (how will you do the right arrow? Wink

Last edited by revolution on 06 Mar 2008, 14:53; edited 1 time in total

06 Mar 2008, 14:50

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 16850
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution

asmhack wrote:

$FFFFFFFF

and also FFFFFFFFh

06 Mar 2008, 14:52

asmhack

Joined: 01 Feb 2008
Posts: 431

asmhack

hahahahaha just details about ~ or -> or whatever..
f*ck that right arrow Razz

06 Mar 2008, 14:56

asmhack

Joined: 01 Feb 2008
Posts: 431

asmhack

ok my last attempt:

limx
x->oo

9 chars and not infinite number.. that's why we use limits..

Last edited by asmhack on 06 Mar 2008, 15:30; edited 2 times in total

06 Mar 2008, 15:08

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 16850
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution

asmhack wrote:

limx
x->oo

But "oo" is not really the symbol for infinity, is it? Infinity looks like this: ∞, and it isn't ASCII 7bit.

06 Mar 2008, 15:15

Artlav

Joined: 23 Dec 2004
Posts: 188
Location: Moscow, Russia

Artlav

revolution wrote:

Artlav wrote:
"n:Vk:n>k"

Where V denotes universal quantifier.
That is, number n, that for any given number k is n>k.

But you haven't really given an actual number or even a description of a number.

I had a strong impression that a description of a number is exactly what i given?

06 Mar 2008, 15:33

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 16850
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution

Artlav wrote:

revolution wrote:

Artlav wrote:
"n:Vk:n>k"

Where V denotes universal quantifier.
That is, number n, that for any given number k is n>k.

But you haven't really given an actual number or even a description of a number.
I had a strong impression that a description of a number is exactly what i given?

Alright, I may have misunderstood, but it seems you are trying to say that what ever number I can write there is always a larger number. Is that correct?

06 Mar 2008, 15:36

asmhack

Joined: 01 Feb 2008
Posts: 431

asmhack

so the conclusion is that the answer is not a limit beacause the shortest thing we can write using limits based on revo's rules is :

lim1/x
x->0

but that is 10 chars.. and i am sure this is not the reason you said 9 chars maximum.. Wink

06 Mar 2008, 15:50

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 16850
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution

asmhack wrote:

so the conclusion is that the answer is not a limit ...

Yes, I doubt that limits is the answer. But I would be happy to see a large number using limits (if you can construct it).

Clue: So far, with all the answers given here:

As for ASCII, we have 7/9 of an answer. Of course I won't tell you which parts come from where, but one person has supplied 5/9 on one posting and the other 2/9 supplied by another person in another posting.

As for concepts, we have 1/3 of an answer, so you still need to find two more concepts to build a large number.

Edit: There is actually the germ of the second concept already mentioned, let's call it 1/2 of a concept, so that make 1/3 + 1/2 * 1/3 = 1/2 of the necessary concepts.

06 Mar 2008, 15:58

bitRAKE

Joined: 21 Jul 2003
Posts: 2796
Location: dank orb

bitRAKE

1/(0+)

_________________
¯\(°_o)/¯ unlicense.org

06 Mar 2008, 16:09

Borsuc

Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 2468
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Borsuc

1/dx

06 Mar 2008, 16:16

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 16850
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution

bitRAKE wrote:

1/(0+)

And "0+" is ... ???

06 Mar 2008, 16:22

asmhack

Joined: 01 Feb 2008
Posts: 431

asmhack

bitRAKE wrote:

1/(0+)

you can't just use 'your own math rules'.. where is lim ?

06 Mar 2008, 16:22

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 16850
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution

The_Grey_Beast wrote:

1/dx

Hmm ...

06 Mar 2008, 16:23

Borsuc

Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 2468
Location: Bucharest, Romania

Borsuc

dx = infinitesmall number (used in integrals and derivatives)

06 Mar 2008, 16:25

bitRAKE

Joined: 21 Jul 2003
Posts: 2796
Location: dank orb

bitRAKE

would you perfer?: 1/(0^+)

I really have to thank this thread for leading me back to the busy beaver function.

_________________
¯\(°_o)/¯ unlicense.org

06 Mar 2008, 16:28

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 16850
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution

The_Grey_Beast wrote:

dx = infinitesmall number (used in integrals and derivatives)

Yeah I know, but what is the number you are describing?

06 Mar 2008, 16:32

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 16850
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution

bitRAKE wrote:

would you perfer?: 1/(0^+)

I really have to thank this thread for leading me back to the busy beaver function.

Your link also says this "... the fraction 1/0 is left undefined ...".

06 Mar 2008, 16:33

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 27, 28, 29 Next

< Last Thread | Next Thread >

Forum Rules:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum