load & store directives on single line

flat assembler
Message board for the users of flat assembler.

Index > Compiler Internals > load & store directives on single line

Author

Thread

edemko

Joined: 18 Jul 2009
Posts: 549

edemko 02 Nov 2010, 06:58

Code:

a db 0
store byte (from a)+1 at a

Code:

a db 0
store (byte from a)+1 at a

:P
reeallly want it

02 Nov 2010, 06:58

edemko

Joined: 18 Jul 2009
Posts: 549

edemko 02 Nov 2010, 07:02

omg really
btw: naming this topic "load" & "store" directives on single line produces "load" & "store" directives on singl

02 Nov 2010, 07:02

revolution
When all else fails, read the source

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 20757
Location: In your JS exploiting you and your system

revolution 02 Nov 2010, 07:03

Code:

a db 1

Solved.

02 Nov 2010, 07:03

edemko

Joined: 18 Jul 2009
Posts: 549

edemko 02 Nov 2010, 07:13

consider macro m1{...

02 Nov 2010, 07:13

bitRAKE

Joined: 21 Jul 2003
Posts: 4308
Location: vpcmpistri

bitRAKE 02 Nov 2010, 07:18

Code:

macro store A {
  match ?,A \{
    load ?
    store ?
  \}
}

...select a desired syntax and code away! Razz

02 Nov 2010, 07:18

edemko

Joined: 18 Jul 2009
Posts: 549

edemko 02 Nov 2010, 07:23

incomplete macro

02 Nov 2010, 07:23

baldr

Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Posts: 1651

baldr 02 Nov 2010, 10:00

edemko,

load and store syntax is similar, but not the same. Perhaps this can help?

Code:

macro allow_single_line [mnemonic] {
  macro allow_nested_#mnemonic \{
    macro mnemonic [args] \\{
    \\common
      \\local !
      ! equ ?
      match head && tail, args \\\{
        restore !
        mnemonic head
        allow_nested_#mnemonic
        tail
        purge mnemonic
      \\\}
      match =?, ! \\\{
        restore !
        mnemonic args
      \\\}
    \\}
  \}
  allow_nested_#mnemonic
}

allow_single_line load, store, if, display, end

a db 0
  db 100
load b from a && load c from a+1 && store c at a && store b at a+1
load d from a && load e from a+1 && if d=100 & e=0 && display "Success!", 13, 10 && end if

Separator && was chosen so it probably won't conflict with correct arguments for most instructions/directives.

02 Nov 2010, 10:00

edemko

Joined: 18 Jul 2009
Posts: 549

edemko 02 Nov 2010, 10:37

very interesting && complicated && thank you && i'll study that && Razz

02 Nov 2010, 10:37

Tomasz Grysztar

Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 8465
Location: Kraków, Poland

Tomasz Grysztar 02 Nov 2010, 11:15

Check out this thread, too.

02 Nov 2010, 11:15

< Last Thread | Next Thread >

Forum Rules:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum