It used to be trendy among atheists to say to Christians that “I contend we are both atheists, I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.”
In a similar way those skeptics, who don't have faith in humanity, progress, science and technology almighty, tell other skeptics that "I contend we are both skeptics, I just hold one less ideology than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all other ideologies, you will understand why I dismiss yours."
it feels just so hilarious and so weird, people in war, killing others, and all others unnecessary conflict, because you don't believe what i believe, and you must believe what i believed,
it just so comedy, with all the blood spilled because all these unnecessary desire to impose what others should believe,
why the heck you want to control what others should believe?
when you say believer, it includes believers of every "stuffs" out there, including science believers too,
Given the context, the meaning of "believer" is unambiguous.
For example, when we talk about computer hardware, the word "processor" would not mean "word processor". Right?
sorry for my language limitation,
changes is always the ingredient for any process,
and people change and always change,
since good and bad depend on perspective, so we can't justify whether the process from believers to non-believers is always positive or negative,
i think, "believers to non-believers" i guess, i should treat them as one word,
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum